El-Rufai is organising the festival with public funds, and I cannot see where it’s written that a taxpayer would be indebted to a politician for benefiting from a government’s use of resources for a beneficial public project. It’s his or her (country’s) money.
Our usually polarised literary community was chaotic this week as a tribe of writers entered the final lapse of its campaign for the boycott of the Kaduna Book and Arts Festival holding in Kaduna from July 5 to 8, 2017, with US-based book reviewer and irr
epressible humourist, Mr. Ikhide Ikheloa, describing the proposed event as “debauchery” and the participants “rented” to deify Governor Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State. The campaign was instigated by their assertion that Kaduna under El-Rufai is an unresol
ved “murder scene” and that it’s against the intellectual tradition for supposed scribes and voices of the society to accept funding from, or be hosted by, its government.
Ordinarily, there’s nothing wrong with writers attending an arts festival organised by a government; it’s mischievous to equate that to legitimising the politics and infractions of Mallam El-Rufai. KABAFEST isn’t morally out of place,
so faulting the state government’s financial support for a festival designed to promote literature in a society stalled by a poor reading culture and the dwindling relevance of books, is personalising this antagonism and taking our political differ
ences too far.
El-Rufai is organising the festival with public funds, and I cannot see where it’s written that a taxpayer would be indebted to a politician for benefiting from a government’s use of resources for a beneficial public project. It’s his
or her (country’s) money. Even if one doesn’t like E-Rufai’s handling of a political situation, calling for the boycott of the festival undermines the protester’s civic education. One does not owe a government anything for participating in an
event it sponsors. It’s a fundamental right. The same event, I emphasised, can be a platform for addressing the December 12, 2015 extrajudicial killings of those Shiites in Zaria, which anchors the central argument of the boycott advocates.
My attempt to explain this centrist perspective to them has made me a target of misapplied counterpoints, with my excuse being interpreted as a hungry writer’s sycophantic alignment. It didn’t matter that I share with them a certain view of the g
overnor, which is enough to join them in calling for the boycott. It’s not only that I’m yet to forgive Governor El-Rufai for his hard-hearted handling of the massacre in Zaria, it has to be for the amusing pettiness of a key member of the org
anising team, Lola Shoneyin.
Ms. Shoneyin and I had a fallout on Facebook – a cause of which is embarrassing to share here – sometime in 2011 and then, being Wole Soyinka’s daughter-in-law, she also couldn’t stomach – or misunderstood? – my satire on the Nobel la
ureate. She’s not only blocked me on all social media platforms, she also blocked me from following the Twitter account of Ake, another arts festival she manages. In fact, she once revealed her hatred of me to a mutual friend and the messenger indee
d delivered that “Lola said if she catch you eh…” caveat. That amused me. When I eventually saw her at a session of the Lagos Black Heritage Festival in 2012, she left a group photograph when I was invited to join. She was 38 then!
This experience of Ms. Shoneyin’s peculiar courtesy should’ve been a guise for me to ridicule her event. Only that I don’t operate that way. That she blocked me from following the Twitter account of her event, even though I’ve no memory of engaging with the account, is a scary syndrome I elected to take as personal, instead of allowing it to guide my assessment of her art and public engagements.
The same Ms. Shoneyin once had me, along with writers B. M. Dzukogi and Ahmed Maiwada, delisted from a cliquey Yahoo listserv of Nigerian writers, Krazitivity, for airing dissenting views. And it did not come as shock to me that neither of these two in
fluential writers received invitations to KADAFEST, an arts festival in a region they have high stake in. In the past two years, no Nigerian writer, north or south of the Niger, has promoted literature among teenagers as much as Dzukogi has, as co-founder
of Annual Schools Carnival of Arts and Festival of Songs (ASCAFS) held in Minna since 1995, and founder of Hill-Top Arts Foundation dedicated to mentoring aspiring young writers, poets, painters and thinkers. The Foundation organises the Nigerian Festiva
l of Teen Authors (NIFESTEENA), a new literary festival for teen authors and artists from all the states of the federation and the FCT. But I was impressed that both Dzukogi and Maiwada – a foremost arts patron, poet and novelist, have also disagree
d with the boycott advocates.
I also explained my opinion of Ms. Shoneyin to the boycotting writers, and restated my support for her event despite that. We need more attention to these dusty shelves of our society, and philistine perception of literature as an inessential luxury by our policymakers. When a diseased citizen boycotts a hospital funded by the government he or she disapproves of, what’s misapplied isn’t emotion, it’s wisdom.
Writing may be a vocation of cliques, but their politics shouldn’t determine one’s participation in literary events. One can only be rattled by being a persona-non-grata if a proposed event had been declared open only for members, or is strictly by inv
itation. A grudging event planner only matters to those idle, what should really do is convenience. And it’s this that determined, just this week, my confirmation of an invitation to the prestigious Iowa International Writing Program, “the oldest an
d largest multinational writing residency in the world,” a competitive three-month residency annually hosted by the University of Iowa, United States. This year, as though the organisers had tracked our conversations – and pettiness – the programme,
as hinted in the letter, will also explore our dilemma: ‘Vital Role Writers Play in Civil Society.’
So, Ms. Shoneyin or Malam El-Rufai shouldn’t be the reason for your absence at KADAFEST; the reason must be convenience or interest. Even Fela Kuti, who lived a life of perpetually uncompromising rebellion, was more practical about a government-sponsor
ed arts festival than the impulsive hardliners. When, in 1976, he was invited to a meeting of the national organising committee, set up by the military government, to deliberate on the hosting of the Second World Black and African Festival of Arts and Cul
ture (FESTAC ’77), he didn’t decline. He went all the way to Kano to attend the meeting, which took place at Bagauda Hotel.
His resignation came later, and not for the fact that government shouldn’t host a festival to promote arts, but his realisation, having interacted with the organising committee, that “FESTAC was just one big hustle, so a whole lot of little military men and useless politicians could fill their pockets. They chop plenty-plenty naira.” This was a legitimate excuse for his boycott.
Though under Mr. Ikhide’s Facebook post, a commenter called KADAFEST too a “hustle,” and called Ms. Shoneyin a serial contractor for government after government, and cited her role in former President Jonathan’s short-lived Bring Back the Book project, which he dismissed as a profligate propaganda, none has come as hard as Fela, and with an evidence, in charging the organising team of self-enrichment.
@GimbaKakanda on Twitter